[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130910175453.GQ3966@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 10:54:53 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jochen Striepe <jochen@...ot.escape.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.5: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 09:45:50AM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:27:51PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 11:58:36PM +0200, Jochen Striepe wrote:
> > > I just got this on 3.10.11 on the same machine. Could that be
> > > related?
> >
> > Several people helped track down another source of spurious stall
> > warnings on large systems, please see below for the patch.
> [...]
> > This is quite rare, but apparently occurs deterministically
> > on systems with about 6TB of memory.
>
> Hmm. My system is an ASUS Eee PC netbook with a total of 2G memory.
> The latest stall was just when booting, while /dev was to be filled
> by udev (and taking a really long time on that). So I think this
> patch should not help at my machine, right?
>
> I tried to reproduce the stall, but without success. Is there anything
> that could help reproducing?
Their stall was due to old-style creation of sysfs entries for memory.
Yours might be having a similar issue with the creation of /dev entries,
so it would be worth trying it.
One thing to try would be to insert delays into the code involved in
creating the /dev entries. These delays will need to be busy-waits
rather than sleeps.
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists