[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522F7878.30800@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 13:52:24 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier.martinez@...labora.co.uk>
CC: Lars Poeschel <poeschel@...onage.de>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Lars Poeschel <larsi@....tu-dresden.de>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@...rix.com>,
Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Enric Balletbo i Serra <eballetbo@...il.com>,
Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@...com>,
Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>,
Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Jon Hunter <jgchunter@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] gpio: interrupt consistency check for OF GPIO IRQs
On 09/10/2013 07:56 AM, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
...
> The only thing that this patch tries to solve is when a driver expect to request
> a IRQ and it doesn't care if is a real IRQ line from an interrupt controller or
> a GPIO pin mapped as an IRQ.
That can be solved in the interrupt chip driver. The fact the previous
attempt didn't work doesn't mean that it's impossible.
> With board files we used to explicitly do the GPIO setup
> (gpio_{request,direction_input}) but with DT these board files are gone and we
> need a way to setup a GPIO implicitly when is mapped as an IRQ.
Well, that's just an example of hacking around something in a board file
that should have been fixed in the GPIO/IRQ controller.
> That's the only use case that this patch covers.
...
> Also, it would be great if we can find a temporary solution so we can finally
> have ethernet working with DT on most OMAP2+ boards. Since I expect that doing
> the mentioned change on gpiolib would take at least a couple of kernel releases.
Really? I thought this patch was error-checking to make sure that
different drivers didn't request a GPIO and an IRQ that are actually the
same signal. This patch shouldn't affect any functionality except in
cases where there's a bug in the DT (incorrect GPIO/IRQ passed to some
driver).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists