linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] usb: ohci/uhci - add soft dependencies on ehci

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:27:09 +0200
From:	Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>
To:	Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
Cc:	linux-usb@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-modules@...r.kernel.org" <linux-modules@...r.kernel.org>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb: ohci/uhci - add soft dependencies on ehci_hcd

On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:31 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>
>> Hi Alan,
>>
>> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 7:02 PM, Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu> wrote:
>> > On Tue, 10 Sep 2013, Tom Gundersen wrote:
>> >
>> >> Support for specifying soft dependencies in the modules themselves was
>> >> introduced in commit 7cb14ba.
>> >>
>> >> In Arch we have always been shipping a module.d(5) fragment ordering ohci/uhci
>> >> after ehci. If this ordering is really necessary, it would be great to move it
>> >> to the kernel and getting the correct fragment generated by depmod.
>> >
>> > The ordering is more of a recommendation than a necessity.  Systems
>> > should work oksy if the modules are loaded in the wrong order.
>> >
>> > The only issue if the drivers are loaded in the wrong order is that
>> > full- and low-speed devices will end up being detected and enumerated
>> > twice, with a disconnection in between.  This can result in
>> > disconcerting messages appearing in the system log.
>> >
>> > In theory, it is possible for a problem to arise.  For example, suppose
>> > a full-speed flash drive is plugged in when the system starts up.
>> > When uhci-hcd or ohci-hcd gets loaded, the drive will be detected and
>> > it may even be mounted.  Then when ehci-hcd loads, the drive will get
>> > disconnected and reconnected.  Any open file references to the original
>> > mount will be orphaned.
>>
>> Thanks for the explanation. Sounds to me that a softdep is indeed appropriate:
>>
>> //
>> The softdep command allows you to specify soft, or optional, module
>> dependencies. modulename can be used without these optional modules
>> installed, but usually with some features missing. For example, a
>> driver for a storage HBA might require another module be loaded in
>> order to use management features.
>>
>> pre-deps and post-deps modules are lists of names and/or aliases of
>> other modules that modprobe will attempt to install (or remove) in
>> order before and after the main module given in the modulename
>> argument.
>> //
>
> So this means that before installing ohci-hcd, modprobe would attempt
> to install ehci-hcd?  And if the attempt failed, it would go ahead and
> load ohci-hcd anyway?

Exactly.

> What about during unloading?  Would this mean that rmmod ohci-hcd would
> automatically cause ehci-hcd to be unloaded also?  Or would unloading
> ehci-hcd cause ohci-hcd to be unloaded?

No, unloading does not care about dependencies.

>> >> Signed-off-by: Tom Gundersen <teg@...m.no>
>> >> Cc: Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>
>> >> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>> >> ---
>> >>  drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c | 1 +
>> >>  drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c | 1 +
>> >>  2 files changed, 2 insertions(+)
>> >>
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c
>> >> index 8f6b695..783b50a 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/ohci-hcd.c
>> >> @@ -1171,6 +1171,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ohci_init_driver);
>> >>  MODULE_AUTHOR (DRIVER_AUTHOR);
>> >>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
>> >>  MODULE_LICENSE ("GPL");
>> >> +MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: ehci_hcd");
>> >>
>> >>  #if defined(CONFIG_ARCH_SA1100) && defined(CONFIG_SA1111)
>> >>  #include "ohci-sa1111.c"
>> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c
>> >> index 4a86b63..c2babf3 100644
>> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c
>> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/uhci-hcd.c
>> >> @@ -937,3 +937,4 @@ module_exit(uhci_hcd_cleanup);
>> >>  MODULE_AUTHOR(DRIVER_AUTHOR);
>> >>  MODULE_DESCRIPTION(DRIVER_DESC);
>> >>  MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
>> >> +MODULE_SOFTDEP("pre: ehci_hcd");
>> >
>> > Where is MODULE_SOFTDEP defined?  It isn't mentioned in any .h files in
>> > my kernel tree.
>>
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/linux/module.h#n104
>
> I think I get the picture.
>
> The MODULE_SOFTDEP lines should be moved to uhci-pci.c and ohci-pci.c,
> because the ordering restrictions apply only to the PCI versions of
> these drivers.  And they should specify "pre: ehci-pci", not ehci-hcd.

Thanks, I'll send a new patch.

-t
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/