[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <522E9C84.9070405@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Mon, 09 Sep 2013 22:13:56 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
CC: Wei Ni <wni@...dia.com>, Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
"khali@...ux-fr.org" <khali@...ux-fr.org>,
"lm-sensors@...sensors.org" <lm-sensors@...sensors.org>,
"linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org" <linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] hwmon: (lm90) Add power control
On 09/09/2013 09:53 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 09/09/2013 08:40 PM, Stephen Warren wrote:
>> On 09/09/2013 09:36 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
...
>>> My understanding is that by adding regulator support you essentially
>>> committed to adding regulators (if necessary dummy ones) for this driver
>>> to all those platforms. This is quite similar to other drivers in the
>>> same situation. Once you start along that route, you'll have to go it
>>> all the way.
>>
>> By using regulator_get_optional(), the regulator should be optional,
>> hence you only have to add it to platforms that need it.
>>
>
> Earlier comments suggest that this is not the intended use case for
> regulator_get_optional().
Isn't the issue only whether the optional aspect of the regulator is
implemented by:
a) regulator_get_optional() returning failure, then the driver having to
check for that and either using or not-using the regulator.
b) regulator_get_optional() returning a dummy regulator automatically
when none is specified in DT or the regulator lookup table, and hence
the driver can always call regulator_enable/disable on the returned value.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists