[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130910225934.GF13318@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:59:34 +0100
From: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Al Viro wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 10, 2013 at 03:41:16PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:
>
> > Obtained from where? There are a whole pile of fixes resulting from
> > review and linux-next testing. Are they included?
>
> -next and yes. The trivial ones - folded into the commits they are fixing
> (I mean, ones directly following the commit being fixed). The rest included
> as individual commits.
>
> I'm looking through the DCACHE_LRU_LIST mess right now...
It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now
(vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should
be doing the right thing. It ought to cover everything in your branch
in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the
end of queue.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists