lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130910231250.GA2450@swordfish>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 02:12:50 +0300
From:	Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>
To:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:	Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>,
	driverdev-devel@...uxdriverproject.org,
	Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 1/2] staging: zram: fix handle_pending_slot_free() and
 zram_reset_device() race

Dan Carpenter noted that handle_pending_slot_free() is racy with
zram_reset_device(). Take write init_lock in zram_slot_free(), thus
preventing any concurrent zram_slot_free(), zram_bvec_rw() or
zram_reset_device(). This also allows to safely check zram->init_done
in handle_pending_slot_free().

Initial intention was to minimze number of handle_pending_slot_free()
call from zram_bvec_rw(), which were slowing down READ requests due to
slot_free_lock spin lock. Jerome Marchand suggested to remove
handle_pending_slot_free() from zram_bvec_rw().

Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/9/9/172
Signed-off-by: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>

---

 drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 13 +++++--------
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
index 91d94b5..7a2d4de 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -521,7 +521,8 @@ static void handle_pending_slot_free(struct zram *zram)
 	while (zram->slot_free_rq) {
 		free_rq = zram->slot_free_rq;
 		zram->slot_free_rq = free_rq->next;
-		zram_free_page(zram, free_rq->index);
+		if (zram->init_done)
+			zram_free_page(zram, free_rq->index);
 		kfree(free_rq);
 	}
 	spin_unlock(&zram->slot_free_lock);
@@ -534,16 +535,13 @@ static int zram_bvec_rw(struct zram *zram, struct bio_vec *bvec, u32 index,
 
 	if (rw == READ) {
 		down_read(&zram->lock);
-		handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
 		ret = zram_bvec_read(zram, bvec, index, offset, bio);
 		up_read(&zram->lock);
 	} else {
 		down_write(&zram->lock);
-		handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
 		ret = zram_bvec_write(zram, bvec, index, offset);
 		up_write(&zram->lock);
 	}
-
 	return ret;
 }
 
@@ -750,12 +748,11 @@ error:
 
 static void zram_slot_free(struct work_struct *work)
 {
-	struct zram *zram;
+	struct zram *zram = container_of(work, struct zram, free_work);
 
-	zram = container_of(work, struct zram, free_work);
-	down_write(&zram->lock);
+	down_write(&zram->init_lock);
 	handle_pending_slot_free(zram);
-	up_write(&zram->lock);
+	up_write(&zram->init_lock);
 }
 
 static void add_slot_free(struct zram *zram, struct zram_slot_free *free_rq)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ