[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130910165212.b95be29e2816dc69c909c058@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:52:12 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"the arch/x86 maintainers" <x86@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/6] tree-sweep: Include linux/sched.h for might_sleep
users
On Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:22:23 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 16, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org> wrote:
> > might_sleep is moving from linux/kernel.h to linux/sched.h, so any users
> > need to include linux/sched.h
>
> Really? <linux/sched.h> is the worst choice w.r.t. include hell.
Yes. Mechanically adding sched.h inclusions into .h files will cause
problems.
I've had decent success with this sort of thing by adding new,
finer-grained headers. Maybe include/linux/might_sleep.h would be a
good starting point to fix whatever it was that this fixed.
I think I'll make x86-include-linux-schedh-in-asm-uaccessh.patch,
tree-sweep-include-linux-schedh-for-might_sleep-users.patch and
sched-mark-should_resched-__always_inline.patch go away for now - I
need a mergeable tree, fast.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists