[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130910142150.23c1dc3b9f44a6f55e4ad1fe@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2013 14:21:50 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-next@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree
Hi Andrew,
Today's linux-next merge of the akpm tree got a conflict in fs/dcache.c
between commits 8aab6a27332b ("vfs: reorganize dput() memory accesses")
and 0d98439ea3c6 ("vfs: use lockred "dead" flag to mark unrecoverably
dead dentries") from Linus' tree and commit "dcache: remove dentries from
LRU before putting on dispose list" from the akpm tree.
I fixed it up (hopefully - see below) and can carry the fix as necessary
(no action is required).
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
diff --cc fs/dcache.c
index a4cc2eb,43a1c0e..0000000
--- a/fs/dcache.c
+++ b/fs/dcache.c
@@@ -374,7 -344,6 +374,7 @@@ static void dentry_lru_add(struct dentr
static void __dentry_lru_del(struct dentry *dentry)
{
list_del_init(&dentry->d_lru);
- dentry->d_flags &= ~(DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST | DCACHE_LRU_LIST);
++ dentry->d_flags &= ~DCACHE_LRU_LIST;
dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
}
@@@ -393,14 -372,15 +403,16 @@@ static void dentry_lru_del(struct dentr
static void dentry_lru_move_list(struct dentry *dentry, struct list_head *list)
{
+ BUG_ON(dentry->d_flags & DCACHE_SHRINK_LIST);
+
spin_lock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
if (list_empty(&dentry->d_lru)) {
+ dentry->d_flags |= DCACHE_LRU_LIST;
list_add_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
- dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused++;
- this_cpu_inc(nr_dentry_unused);
} else {
list_move_tail(&dentry->d_lru, list);
+ dentry->d_sb->s_nr_dentry_unused--;
+ this_cpu_dec(nr_dentry_unused);
}
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_sb->s_dentry_lru_lock);
}
@@@ -498,7 -478,8 +510,8 @@@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(d_drop)
* If ref is non-zero, then decrement the refcount too.
* Returns dentry requiring refcount drop, or NULL if we're done.
*/
- static inline struct dentry *dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry)
+ static inline struct dentry *
-dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry, int ref, int unlock_on_failure)
++dentry_kill(struct dentry *dentry, int unlock_on_failure)
__releases(dentry->d_lock)
{
struct inode *inode;
@@@ -591,7 -573,7 +606,7 @@@ repeat
return;
kill_it:
- dentry = dentry_kill(dentry);
- dentry = dentry_kill(dentry, 1, 1);
++ dentry = dentry_kill(dentry, 1);
if (dentry)
goto repeat;
}
@@@ -816,7 -798,7 +831,7 @@@ static struct dentry * try_prune_one_de
{
struct dentry *parent;
- parent = dentry_kill(dentry);
- parent = dentry_kill(dentry, 0, 0);
++ parent = dentry_kill(dentry, 0);
/*
* If dentry_kill returns NULL, we have nothing more to do.
* if it returns the same dentry, trylocks failed. In either
@@@ -836,9 -818,10 +851,10 @@@
dentry = parent;
while (dentry) {
if (lockref_put_or_lock(&dentry->d_lockref))
- return;
- dentry = dentry_kill(dentry);
+ return NULL;
- dentry = dentry_kill(dentry, 1, 1);
++ dentry = dentry_kill(dentry, 1);
}
+ return NULL;
}
static void shrink_dentry_list(struct list_head *list)
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists