linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH V3]hrtimer: Fix a performance regression by disable reprogramming in remove

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1378895123.5476.83.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:25:23 +0200
From:	Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, ethan.kernel@...il.com,
	rjw@...k.pl, daniel.lezcano@...aro.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	lenb@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3]hrtimer: Fix a performance regression by disable
 reprogramming in remove_hrtimer

On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 10:56 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote: 
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:46:35PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:30:44PM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > > diff --git a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> > > index fa6964d..486c0ba 100644
> > > --- a/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> > > +++ b/drivers/idle/intel_idle.c
> > > @@ -359,6 +359,14 @@ static int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> > >  	if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate))))
> > >  		clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_ENTER, &cpu);
> > >  
> > > +	current_thread_into()->status |= TS_POLLING;
> > > +
> > > +	/*
> > > +	 * Order against setting of TS_POLLING against the reading of
> > > +	 * NEED_RESCHED, matched by resched_task().
> > > +	 */
> > > +	smp_mb();
> > > +
> > >  	if (!need_resched()) {
> > >  
> > >  		__monitor((void *)&current_thread_info()->flags, 0, 0);
> > > @@ -367,6 +375,8 @@ static int intel_idle(struct cpuidle_device *dev,
> > >  			__mwait(eax, ecx);
> > >  	}
> > >  
> > > +	current_thread_into()->status &= ~TS_POLLING;
> > > +
> > >  	if (!(lapic_timer_reliable_states & (1 << (cstate))))
> > >  		clockevents_notify(CLOCK_EVT_NOTIFY_BROADCAST_EXIT, &cpu);
> > 
> > Hmm, arguably it would be better to set this from
> > intel_idle_cpuidle_driver_init() and clear it whenever this goes away.
> > Not sure how all that works, the cpuidle driver framework seems 'weird'.
> 
> OK, so I went over the idle stuff again, and we do set TS_POLLING like
> stuff, it got hidden in current_{clr,set}_polling().
> 
> Still if that patch causes extra IPIs its bound to be broken in some
> creative way.. I'll prod.

(thanks, when I get a break from testing/poking this'n'that, I'll take a
peek too...  well, good_intentions++ anyway;)

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/