[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130911110901.GD26777@darko.cambridge.arm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 12:09:01 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alexander Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] FS: Export poll_select_copy_remaining and rename
poll_select_copy_remaining in compat.c so it does not pick the wrong copy.
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:57PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> The ILP32 ABI in ARM64 uses a slightly different pselect from either
> the compat or even the native LP64 ABI. We would want to reuse some
> of the code path that are used as the size of the timespec is the
> same, so this patch exports poll_select_copy_remaining from
> fs/select.c and renames the copy in fs/compat.c to make sure that it
> is not being used.
>
> Signed-off-by: Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>
I think this patch has to wait until we review the ILP32 ABI for arm64.
When I looked at this some time ago I thought we can just use the native
arm64 pselect6 and ppoll. Once we agree that's not possible we can push
this patch. On its own it doesn't have much value.
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists