[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130911112406.GB7393@intel.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:24:06 +0300
From: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>, "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND 1/2] i2c: prepare runtime PM support for I2C
client devices
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 12:14:09PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 02:05:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
>
> > I'll also look into converting the existing I2C client drivers to use this
> > method. One question, though, is it better to have the conversion in the
> > same patch that introduces the I2C core runtime PM change or as a separate
> > patch?
>
> In theory it ought to be part of the same patch but in practice a brief
> bit of bisection breakage on a single branch is probably worth the ease
> of review from my point of view, others may disagree though.
OK, I'll keep them separate, unless there are objections.
> Like I say I think you'll need to convert SPI at the same time due to the
> devices with both buses sharing code.
Yes, I'm looking into that :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists