[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130911141302.GA11342@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 07:13:02 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
josh@...htriplett.org, niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side critical
section?
On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 03:34:26PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 05:59:17PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> > On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 17:40:26 -0400
> > Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Agreed. So how about rcu_is_online() ?
> >
> > Nope, what about all_your_base_are_belong_to_rcu()?
>
> Let's see if I can remember the candidates...
>
> rcu_is_cpu_idle() # reversed sense from the others
> rcu_is_ignored() # reversed sense from the others
> rcu_is_not_active() # reversed sense from the others
> rcu_is_watching_cpu()
> rcu_read_check()
> rcu_is_active()
> rcu_is_active_local()
> rcu_is_online()
> rcu_is_watching_task()
> rcu_is_watching_thread()
> rcu_is_watching_you()
> all_your_base_are_belong_to_rcu()
> rcu_is_active_loco()
> rcu_kilroy_was_here()
>
> Maybe I should just lock them all in a room overnight and see which
> are still alive in the morning.
And after treating injuries, the survivor is rcu_is_watching().
Thanx, Paul
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists