[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130911154726.GA8093@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 17:47:26 +0200
From: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>
Cc: anton@...hat.com, Hemant Kumar Shaw <hkshaw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com,
Mikhail Kulemin <Mikhail.Kulemin@...ibm.com>,
srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, systemtap@...rceware.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] uprobes: Fix utask->depth accounting in handle_trampoline()
Currently utask->depth is simply the number of allocated/pending
return_instance's in uprobe_task->return_instances list.
handle_trampoline() should decrement this counter every time we
handle/free an instance, but due to typo it does this only if
->chained == T. This means that in the likely case this counter
is never decremented and the probed task can't report more than
MAX_URETPROBE_DEPTH events.
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Reported-by: Mikhail Kulemin <Mikhail.Kulemin@...ibm.com>
Reported-by: Hemant Kumar Shaw <hkshaw@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/events/uprobes.c | 4 +---
1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/events/uprobes.c b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
index f356974..ad8e1bd 100644
--- a/kernel/events/uprobes.c
+++ b/kernel/events/uprobes.c
@@ -1682,12 +1682,10 @@ static bool handle_trampoline(struct pt_regs *regs)
tmp = ri;
ri = ri->next;
kfree(tmp);
+ utask->depth--;
if (!chained)
break;
-
- utask->depth--;
-
BUG_ON(!ri);
}
--
1.5.5.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists