linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kobject: introduce kobj

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130911171508.GA29741@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 10:15:08 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...ux.com>
To:	Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
Cc:	Linux Kernel Maling List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kobject: introduce kobj_completion

On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 01:00:30PM -0400, Jeff Mahoney wrote:
> A common way to handle kobject lifetimes in embedded in objects with
> different lifetime rules is to pair the kobject with a struct completion.
> 
> This introduces a kobj_completion structure that can be used in place
> of the pairing, along with several convenience functions for
> initialization, release, and put-and-wait.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Jeff Mahoney <jeffm@...e.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/kobj_completion.h |   18 ++++++++++++++

Does this really need a new .h file, or can we just cram it into
kobject.h?  It's only 13 more lines to add to that file.

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/