[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130911183825.GC10105@radagast>
Date: Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:38:25 -0500
From: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
To: Alexey Pelykh <alexey.pelykh@...il.com>
CC: <balbi@...com>, Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Linux OMAP Mailing List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: commit 5fe212364 causes division by zero with large bauds
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 09:22:26AM +0300, Alexey Pelykh wrote:
> Hi Felipe,
>
> Thanks for finding this issue. Indeed, there is a bug on 3M+ baud
> rates. First patch is close to a complete fix, but still contains
> div-by-zero issue. Here is my version:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> index 816d1a2..808a880 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/omap-serial.c
> @@ -240,8 +240,8 @@ serial_omap_baud_is_mode16(struct uart_port *port,
> unsigned int baud)
> {
> unsigned int n13 = port->uartclk / (13 * baud);
> unsigned int n16 = port->uartclk / (16 * baud);
> - int baudAbsDiff13 = baud - (port->uartclk / (13 * n13));
> - int baudAbsDiff16 = baud - (port->uartclk / (16 * n16));
> + int baudAbsDiff13 = n13 ? (baud - (port->uartclk / (13 * n13))) : INT_MAX;
> + int baudAbsDiff16 = n16 ? (baud - (port->uartclk / (16 * n16))) : INT_MAX;
IOW:
int baudAbsDiff13 = 0;
if (n13)
baudAbsDiff13 = (baud - (port->uartclk / (13 * n13)));
which is exactly what my patch did. I fail to see where division by zero
would be coming from.
> if(baudAbsDiff13 < 0)
> baudAbsDiff13 = -baudAbsDiff13;
> if(baudAbsDiff16 < 0)
>
>
> With 48MHz UART clock, it will give
> 300: divisor = 12307 (13), real rate 300 (0.000000%)
> 600: divisor = 6153 (13), real rate 600 (0.000000%)
> 1200: divisor = 3076 (13), real rate 1200 (0.000000%)
> 2400: divisor = 1538 (13), real rate 2400 (0.000000%)
TRM has these all set with oversampling of 16. In fact only 460800,
921600, 1843200 and 3686400 should be using oversampling of 13.
--
balbi
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists