linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: tegra: Remove not used header and clean up codes

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <5230C240.8050602@wwwdotorg.org>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 13:19:28 -0600
From:	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To:	Bill Huang <bilhuang@...dia.com>
CC:	rjw@...k.pl, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, linux@....linux.org.uk,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] cpufreq: tegra: Remove not used header and clean
 up codes

On 09/11/2013 05:19 AM, Bill Huang wrote:
> Remove inclustion of the not needed header files and remove the logic
> to check the CPU ID to not exceeding the maximum supported CPUs.

> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/tegra-cpufreq.c

> - * Copyright (C) 2010 Google, Inc.
> + * Copyright (c) 2013, NVIDIA Corporation.
> + * Copyright (C) 2010-2013 Google, Inc.

This is such a trivial patch, I don't think it's appropriate to add an
NVIDIA (c) notice. It may well be appropriate in patch 2/2.

I assume that Google didn't write this patch, so why adjust that (c) notice?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/