linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/Resource: Add address translation support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1471266.A5mlsVTEW9@vostro.rjw.lan>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 22:37:33 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Cc:	lenb@...nel.org, yinghai@...nel.org, bhelgaas@...gle.com,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 2/4] ACPI/Resource: Add address translation support

On Wednesday, September 11, 2013 10:26:37 AM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> On 09/08/2013 10:18 PM, Lan Tianyu wrote:
> > On 2013年09月07日 08:15, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> >> On Friday, September 06, 2013 10:24:44 AM Lan Tianyu wrote:
> >>> According ACPI 5.0 spec Section 19.1.8
> >>> "For bridges, translate addresses across the bridge, this is the
> >>> offset that must be added to the address on the secondary side
> >>> to obtain the address on the primary side. Non-bridge devices
> >>> must list 0."
> >>
> >> Can you please have a look into the previous versions of the spec and double
> >> check that this change won't confuse systems that implement them?
> >>
> >
> > Hi Rafael:
> >           I check all versions. This part has existed and not been
> > changed since ACPI 1.0.
> >
> 
> Hi Rafael:
> 	Do you have other comments on this?

Well, why would I?  You're saying that you've verified it and that's OK.

Thanks,
Rafael

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/