lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130911143047.8cc69ea05e0d2c1e4db9fbd9@canb.auug.org.au>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 14:30:47 +1000
From:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>, linux-next@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Dave Chinner <dchinner@...hat.com>,
	Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with Linus' tree

Hi Andrew,

On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 16:13:02 -0700 Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 10 Sep 2013 23:59:34 +0100 Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk> wrote:
> >
> > It's not that bad, actually; I think the variant I've pushed right now
> > (vfs.git#for-next, head at f5e1dd34561e0fb06400b378d595198918833021) should
> > be doing the right thing.  It ought to cover everything in your branch
> > in -next from "fs: bump inode and dentry counters to long" on to the
> > end of queue.
> 
> That's the correct starting point.  The end point should be
> "staging/lustre/libcfs: cleanup linux-mem.h".

OK, so I have removed that set of patches from the copy of the -mm tree
that is in linux-next today.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell                    sfr@...b.auug.org.au

Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ