[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1378965701.10696.36.camel@marge.simpson.net>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:01:41 +0200
From: Mike Galbraith <bitbucket@...ine.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>, Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@...ux.intel.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Vaidyanathan Srinivasan <svaidy@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/7] sched: Add NEED_RESCHED to the preempt_count
On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 15:34 +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 13:06 +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Mike does it fix the funny you saw?
>
> Yup, modulo test_need_resched() not existing in master.
...
> while I haven't yet booted Q6600 box, core2
> Toshiba Satellite lappy is using mwait_idle_with_hints() in master.
Heh. Core2 lappy uses mwait_idle_with_hints().. unless you boot
processor.max_cstate=1 so it doesn't use piece of shite hpet. Q6600
always has idle woes, seemingly because box doesn't do deep enough
cstate to make something (acpi?) happy, despite mwait_idle() having
worked fine for years.
Seems I need to find the cstate dependency spot, and rap it upside the
head if I want my core2 boxen to regain happy campers status.
-Mike
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists