[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912063840.GB11583@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 08:38:40 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, mingo@...e.hu, laijs@...fujitsu.com,
dipankar@...ibm.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
niv@...ibm.com, tglx@...utronix.de, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, darren@...art.com,
sbw@....edu
Subject: Re: [PATCH] rcu: Is it safe to enter an RCU read-side critical
section?
* Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 9 Sep 2013, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> > So my NAK stands: you are still in denial, you should stop the silly
> > arguing and you should stop wasting maintainer time. You need to
> > address PeterZ's review feedback and fix the bugs in your patches,
> > ASAP.
>
> You are NAKing my patches that add the preempt checks? Now I am
> confused. I thought you wanted those?
My NAK of the original patches stands until the debug checks are working
and are put up for a merge. You were talking nonsense all around in this
thread and I simply don't trust your promise, but I'll obviously trust a
queued up fix.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists