[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912093145.GA29403@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 10:31:45 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] spi: prepare runtime PM support for SPI devices
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:27:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > I would be able to have this and the other patch in the SPI tree in case
> > it overlaps with other work - I'm not sure what the plan will be for
> > merging this stuff but if there were a branch which I could merge into
> > the SPI tree that'd be good.
> I think these two can go via your SPI tree as they shouldn't have
> dependencies to the I2C tree.
There's all the driver changes though - it seems best to push the whole
series through one branch so there's fewer bisection problems.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists