linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: EDMA: Fix clearing of unused list for DT DMA resources

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 15:28:23 +0530
From:	Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
To:	Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
CC:	Matt Porter <matt@...orter.com>, Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	Dan Williams <djbw@...com>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
	Jyri Sarah <jsarha@...com>,
	Jason Kridner <jkridner@...gleboard.org>,
	Koen Kooi <koen@...gleboard.org>,
	Linux OMAP List <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux ARM Kernel List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Linux DaVinci Kernel List 
	<davinci-linux-open-source@...ux.davincidsp.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux MMC List <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Pantel Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] ARM: EDMA: Fix clearing of unused list for DT DMA
 resources

On Wednesday 11 September 2013 12:22 AM, Joel Fernandes wrote:
> HWMOD removal for MMC is breaking edma_start as the events are being manually
> triggered due to unused channel list not being clear.
> 
> This patch fixes the issue, by reading the "dmas" property from the DT node if
> it exists and clearing the bits in the unused channel list. For this purpose
> we use the of_* helpers to parse the arguments in the dmas phandle list.
> 
> Reviewed-by: Sekhar Nori <nsekhar@...com>
> Reported-by: Balaji T K <balajitk@...com>
> Cc: Pantel Antoniou <panto@...oniou-consulting.com>
> Signed-off-by: Joel Fernandes <joelf@...com>
> ---
> This patch is a repost of v2 with minor change of return value.

Is this patch meant for merging? If yes, I see no resolution of the
comments given in this thread:

https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/30/9

It is better to send one version with all comments fixed. Helps avoid
confusion.

Thanks,
Sekhar

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/