[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <52319218.3080609@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 18:06:16 +0800
From: Tang Chen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
To: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
CC: rjw@...k.pl, lenb@...nel.org, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...e.hu,
hpa@...or.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, trenn@...e.de,
yinghai@...nel.org, jiang.liu@...wei.com, wency@...fujitsu.com,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com,
izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com, mgorman@...e.de, minchan@...nel.org,
mina86@...a86.com, gong.chen@...ux.intel.com,
vasilis.liaskovitis@...fitbricks.com, lwoodman@...hat.com,
riel@...hat.com, jweiner@...hat.com, prarit@...hat.com,
zhangyanfei@...fujitsu.com, toshi.kani@...com, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/9] x86, memblock: Allocate memory near kernel image
before SRAT parsed.
On 09/11/2013 08:51 PM, Tejun Heo wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 06:07:28PM +0800, Tang Chen wrote:
>> This patch-set is based on tj's suggestion, and not fully tested.
>> Just for review and discussion. And according to tj's suggestion,
>> implemented a new function memblock_alloc_bottom_up() to allocate
>> memory from bottom upwards, whihc can simplify the code.
>
> For $DEITY's sake, can you please specify against which tree the
> patches are? :(
>
Hi tj,
So sorry for the trouble. I have rebased the patches to the latest
kernel and resent it. I cannot access to my github now, so sorry for
that I cannot give you a tree with these patches.
Thanks. :)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists