linux-kernel - Re: [146/251] zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130911212051.459dbd59@gandalf.local.home>
Date:	Wed, 11 Sep 2013 21:20:51 -0400
From:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To:	Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
	Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Subject: Re: [146/251] zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page() in
 swap free notify path

On Wed, 11 Sep 2013 09:42:42 +0100
Luis Henriques <luis.henriques@...onical.com> wrote:

> Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org> writes:
> 
> > 3.6.11.9-rc1 stable review patch.
> > If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
> 
> This commit seems to cause regressions [1].  There's a fix for it with
> commit a0c516cbfc7452c8cbd564525fef66d9f20b46d1 but it doesn't apply
> cleanly (it probably requires several other commits to be
> backported).  Thus, I am reverting it from the 3.5 extended stable
> kernel.
> 
> [1] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1215513
> 

Thanks! I reverted it too.

-- Steve
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/