[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912110322.GB3367@katana>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 13:04:28 +0200
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc: Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] spi: prepare runtime PM support for SPI devices
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 01:04:55PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Thursday, September 12, 2013 12:43:02 PM Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:31:45AM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 12:27:43PM +0300, Mika Westerberg wrote:
> > > > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 04:51:20PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> > >
> > > > > I would be able to have this and the other patch in the SPI tree in case
> > > > > it overlaps with other work - I'm not sure what the plan will be for
> > > > > merging this stuff but if there were a branch which I could merge into
> > > > > the SPI tree that'd be good.
> > >
> > > > I think these two can go via your SPI tree as they shouldn't have
> > > > dependencies to the I2C tree.
> > >
> > > There's all the driver changes though - it seems best to push the whole
> > > series through one branch so there's fewer bisection problems.
> >
> > Ah, right. Then I suppose the right tree would be the I2C tree (as majority
> > of the patches are I2C related)?
> >
> > Wolfram, are you OK with this?
>
> Alternatively, I can apply them too if everyone is OK with that.
>
> They are PM+ACPI changes after all ...
I'd like to give at least an ACK. But I need to find some time for that.
Is it urgent? Looks like 3.13 material to me...
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists