[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912115710.25951.98497.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 17:29:09 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: rjw@...k.pl, viresh.kumar@...aro.org, swarren@...dotorg.org
Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH] cpufreq: Detect spurious invocations of update_policy_cpu()
The function update_policy_cpu() is expected to be called when the policy->cpu
of a cpufreq policy is to be changed: ie., the new CPU nominated to become the
policy->cpu is different from the old one.
Print a warning if it is invoked with new_cpu == old_cpu, since such an
invocation might hint at a faulty logic in the caller.
Suggested-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
index 43c24aa..2084132 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/cpufreq.c
@@ -949,7 +949,7 @@ static void cpufreq_policy_free(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
static void update_policy_cpu(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int cpu)
{
- if (cpu == policy->cpu)
+ if (WARN_ON(cpu == policy->cpu))
return;
policy->last_cpu = policy->cpu;
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists