linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf: parse the dwarf backtrace info from .debug

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130912121953.GX31370@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 14:19:53 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org" <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] perf: parse the dwarf backtrace info from
 .debug_frame section

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:07:23PM +0200, Jean Pihet wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> -- Adding more maintainers in the To: list --
> 
> Ping about the patch set, is this one acceptable for mainline?

The below looks to be mostly ARM bits and I would suspect Will to take
care of them.

> On 9 September 2013 12:00, Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org> wrote:

> >  arch/arm/Kconfig                        |  2 +
> >  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/Kbuild        |  1 +
> >  arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h   | 23 +++++++++++
> >  arch/arm/kernel/Makefile                |  1 +
> >  arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c             | 30 ++++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/arch/arm/Makefile            |  3 ++
> >  tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c       | 48 ++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  tools/perf/config/Makefile              |  9 +++--
> >  tools/perf/util/unwind.c                | 71 +++++++++++++++++++++++++--------

This one looks to be generic code, Acme who do we want to look at that?

> >  10 files changed, 223 insertions(+), 19 deletions(-)
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/include/uapi/asm/perf_regs.h
> >  create mode 100644 arch/arm/kernel/perf_regs.c
> >  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/include/perf_regs.h
> >  create mode 100644 tools/perf/arch/arm/util/unwind.c
> >
> > --
> > 1.7.11.7
> >
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/