[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <3E38F48E-EE41-4564-84A1-36CF07B08811@codeaurora.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 12:55:36 -0500
From: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: David Brown <davidb@...eaurora.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Ian Campbell <ijc+devicetree@...lion.org.uk>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org list" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rohit Vaswani <rvaswani@...eaurora.org>,
linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: msm: Move msm devicetrees under a Qualcomm dir
On Sep 12, 2013, at 12:06 PM, Olof Johansson wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:53 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Sep 12, 2013, at 11:46 AM, Olof Johansson wrote:
>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 9:37 AM, Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org> wrote:
>>>> Use the Qualcomm vendor prefix (qcom) as the directory name for
>>>> Qualcomm MSM devicetrees going forward.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Kumar Gala <galak@...eaurora.org>
>>>
>>> Let's not move just one platform like this. If we are to do this, we
>>> should move everything, and that will be really painful and needs to
>>> be done in a controlled manner, probably scripted and right before a
>>> -rc1 or such.
>>
>>
>> Than I suggest we deal with it when we pull the device trees out of the kernel tree.
>>
>> As such, I'd tell Rohit to go forward with the file being named apq8074-dragonboard.dtb for the time being.
>
> My original request to please use a common prefix for your product
> families stands. Please prefix with msm-*, or if you have to, qcom-*
> instead, since you guys can't seem to make your mind up on standard
> prefixes (msm, apq, etc).
This is silly, I dont see the reason to go with qcom-apq<SOC>-<BOARD>.dts and than in the future drop qcom- when we mostly likely shift to a dir structure. As engineers we are all too aware of the lack of sanity in marketing names, but its what we have so we have to live with it.
- k
--
Employee of Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc.
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum, hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists