[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912180120.GB32511@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 20:01:20 +0200
From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Patch v5 0/9] liblockdep: userspace lockdep
* Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> On 07/08/2013 04:39 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> >* Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> wrote:
> >
> >>>>The other issue is that with lock classes disabled you have to hit an
> >>>>actual deadlock to trigger any output.
> >>>>
> >>>>I.e. much of the power of lockdep is diminished :-/ When actual
> >>>>deadlocks are triggered then it's not particularly complex to debug
> >>>>user-space apps: gdb the hung task(s) and look at the backtraces.
> >>>
> >>>Lock classes are disabled only if you're using the LD_PRELOAD method
> >>>of testing. If you actually re-compile your code with the library (by
> >>>just including the header and setting a #define to enable it) you will
> >>>have lock classes.
> >>
> >>Hi Ingo,
> >>
> >>Just wondering if you're planning on pushing it over to Linus from your
> >>tree, or should I go ahead and do it on my own?
> >
> >PeterZ is in favor as well so I'll apply them after the merge window, for
> >v3.12.
>
> Hi Ingo,
>
> Do you intend to send liblockdep in this merge window as planned?
If Peter agrees with them and picks them up then the next merge window
would be fine I guess.
Thanks,
Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists