[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <tip-2dbf0116aa8c7bfa900352d3f7b2609748fcc1c5@git.kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 11:04:05 -0700
From: tip-bot for Andi Kleen <tipbot@...or.com>
To: linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, hpa@...or.com, mingo@...nel.org,
peterz@...radead.org, ak@...ux.intel.com, tglx@...utronix.de
Subject: [tip:perf/core] perf/x86/intel:
Avoid checkpointed counters causing excessive TSX aborts
Commit-ID: 2dbf0116aa8c7bfa900352d3f7b2609748fcc1c5
Gitweb: http://git.kernel.org/tip/2dbf0116aa8c7bfa900352d3f7b2609748fcc1c5
Author: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
AuthorDate: Thu, 5 Sep 2013 20:37:38 -0700
Committer: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
CommitDate: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 19:13:33 +0200
perf/x86/intel: Avoid checkpointed counters causing excessive TSX aborts
With checkpointed counters there can be a situation where the counter
is overflowing, aborts the transaction, is set back to a non overflowing
checkpoint, causes interupt. The interrupt doesn't see the overflow
because it has been checkpointed. This is then a spurious PMI, typically with
a ugly NMI message. It can also lead to excessive aborts.
Avoid this problem by:
- Using the full counter width for counting counters (earlier patch)
- Forbid sampling for checkpointed counters. It's not too useful anyways,
checkpointing is mainly for counting. The check is approximate
(to still handle KVM), but should catch the majority of cases.
- On a PMI always set back checkpointed counters to zero.
Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1378438661-24765-2-git-send-email-andi@firstfloor.org
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c | 37 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 37 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
index 9db76c3..57d64b7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel.c
@@ -1282,6 +1282,11 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
__x86_pmu_enable_event(hwc, ARCH_PERFMON_EVENTSEL_ENABLE);
}
+static inline bool event_is_checkpointed(struct perf_event *event)
+{
+ return (event->hw.config & HSW_IN_TX_CHECKPOINTED) != 0;
+}
+
/*
* Save and restart an expired event. Called by NMI contexts,
* so it has to be careful about preempting normal event ops:
@@ -1289,6 +1294,17 @@ static void intel_pmu_enable_event(struct perf_event *event)
int intel_pmu_save_and_restart(struct perf_event *event)
{
x86_perf_event_update(event);
+ /*
+ * For a checkpointed counter always reset back to 0. This
+ * avoids a situation where the counter overflows, aborts the
+ * transaction and is then set back to shortly before the
+ * overflow, and overflows and aborts again.
+ */
+ if (unlikely(event_is_checkpointed(event))) {
+ /* No race with NMIs because the counter should not be armed */
+ wrmsrl(event->hw.event_base, 0);
+ local64_set(&event->hw.prev_count, 0);
+ }
return x86_perf_event_set_period(event);
}
@@ -1372,6 +1388,13 @@ again:
x86_pmu.drain_pebs(regs);
}
+ /*
+ * To avoid spurious interrupts with perf stat always reset checkpointed
+ * counters.
+ */
+ if (cpuc->events[2] && event_is_checkpointed(cpuc->events[2]))
+ status |= (1ULL << 2);
+
for_each_set_bit(bit, (unsigned long *)&status, X86_PMC_IDX_MAX) {
struct perf_event *event = cpuc->events[bit];
@@ -1837,6 +1860,20 @@ static int hsw_hw_config(struct perf_event *event)
event->attr.precise_ip > 0))
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ if (event_is_checkpointed(event)) {
+ /*
+ * Sampling of checkpointed events can cause situations where
+ * the CPU constantly aborts because of a overflow, which is
+ * then checkpointed back and ignored. Forbid checkpointing
+ * for sampling.
+ *
+ * But still allow a long sampling period, so that perf stat
+ * from KVM works.
+ */
+ if (event->attr.sample_period > 0 &&
+ event->attr.sample_period < 0x7fffffff)
+ return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+ }
return 0;
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists