lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912183503.GB25386@somewhere>
Date:	Thu, 12 Sep 2013 20:35:05 +0200
From:	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
To:	"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Gilad Ben-Yossef <gilad@...yossef.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] Restrict kernel spawning of threads to a specified set of
 cpus.

On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 08:39:22AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:11:04PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:52:56PM +0000, Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > > On Thu, 12 Sep 2013, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > > 
> > > > > > Ok but you can change the affinity of a kthread from userspace, as
> > > > > > long as you define a cpu set that is among that kthread's cpus allowed.
> > > > >
> > > > > Ok but at that point kthread has already spawned a lot of kernel threads.
> > > > >
> > > > > The same is true for init and kmod.
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > Ok but then we just need to set the affinity of all these kthreads.
> > > > A simple lookup on /proc/[0-9]+/ should do the trick.
> > > 
> > > Yea but the kernel option makes it easy. No extras needed. Kernel brings
> > > it up user space cleanly configured and ready to go.
> > 
> > Ok but really that's just two lines of bash. I really wish we don't complicate
> > core kernel code for that.
> 
> OK, I will bite...  How do you handle the case where you have collected
> all the kthreads, one of the kthreads spawns another kthread, then you
> set affinity on the collected kthreads, which does not include the newly
> spawned one?

Just offline the CPUs you want to isolate, affine your kthreads and re-online
the CPUs.

If you're lucky enough to have 1024 CPUs, a winter night should be enough ;-)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ