[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKMK7uHqufs64=pD=o--958Ns+NAsrwUTNpcd2_WGQnoJRnfOQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:23:02 +0200
From: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...ll.ch>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dave Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>,
Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@...are.com>,
intel-gfx <intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
dri-devel <dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [BUG] completely bonkers use of set_need_resched + VM_FAULT_NOPAGE
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 10:20 PM, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> wrote:
>> I think for ttm drivers it's just execbuf being exploitable. But on
>> drm/i915 we've
>> had the same issue with the pwrite/pread ioctls, so a simple
>> glBufferData(glMap) kind of recursion from gl clients blew the kernel
>> to pieces ...
>
> And the only answer you folks came up with is set_need_resched() and
> yield()? Oh well....
The yield was for a different lifelock, and that one is also fixed by
now. The fault handler deadlock was fixed in the usual "drop locks and
jump into slowpath" fasion, at least in drm/i915.
-Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
+41 (0) 79 365 57 48 - http://blog.ffwll.ch
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists