[<prev] [next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130912215810.GX29403@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2013 22:58:10 +0100
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: "Opensource [Adam Thomson]" <Adam.Thomson.Opensource@...semi.com>
Cc: Ashish Chavan <ashish.chavan@...tcummins.com>, lrg <lrg@...com>,
alsa-devel <alsa-devel@...a-project.org>,
David Dajun Chen <david.chen@...semi.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"kiran.padwal" <kiran.padwal@...tcummins.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] ASoC: codecs: da9055: Update driver name to
fix breakage due to pmic driver with same name
On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 05:11:06PM +0000, Opensource [Adam Thomson] wrote:
> It's limiting in as much as it's insisting on a required order for
> initialisation which shouldn't be there. As said previously they're 2 separate
> devices in one package, with no internal connection, so either could be
> instantiated first. It should be open to the user to decide on this based on
> their platform and needs.
> With your approach, it is more work for no gain here, and holds us to a
> logical representation which doesn't fit with the device in question (which is
> not really an MFD, it's two devices, one of which is an MFD, the PMIC).
I'm having a hard time understanding this as a practical limitation, can
you be more specific about the cases where this would present a noticable
problem? It'd at least ensure that the configuration where the whole
device is present gets tested to some extent, though that doesn't seem
likely to break again.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists