[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFrcx1=7Crxms8GBaen451JuYPO_WpC_SbcTuti5y3MfeQMCZA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 11:32:19 +0200
From: Jean Pihet <jean.pihet@...aro.org>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] perf fixes
Hi,
On 13 September 2013 07:09, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> * David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
>
>> > By default a simple 'make' should build perf to the maximum extent
>> > possible, with no other input required from the user - with warnings
>> > displayed as package install suggestions.
>>
>> By default there is no config. Autoprobing generates a first one or a
>> user can specify a defconfig.
>
> This could work if there's not two but three states for individual
> features:
>
> - autoprobe
> - on
> - off
>
> and if autoprobe, if a system feature has been probed successfully,
> automatically turned 'autoprobe' entries into 'on'.
>
> That would give us the best of all worlds - autodetection, configurability
> and caching:
>
> - initial user types 'make' and gets a .config that has almost all
> entries 'on', a few 'autoprobe'.
>
> - once the user installs a dependency, the corresponding .config entry
> turns into 'on'.
>
> - the regular user or developers would have libraries that turn all
> entries in the .config to 'on'.
>
> - if a user is genuinely uninterested in a feature, he can mark it 'off',
> which would then stay off permanently. This could also be used by
> embedded/specialized builds.
>
> - other specialized users, like distro builds, could use a .config with
> all entries 'on' and could enforce the presence of all dependencies for
> a successful build. [We could add 'make allyesconfig' to help that.]
Is there a way to detect the presence of a dependency and _also_ check
its version? Some new features are depending on a recent version of a
library, e.g. dwarf unwinding depends on libunwind >= 1.1 (cf.
http://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg1598951.html).
Thanks,
Jean
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists