[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130913095739.GB10385@arm.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 10:57:40 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc: Andrew Pinski <pinskia@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andrew Pinski <apinski@...ium.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] ARM64: Add support for ILP32 ABI.
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 10:47:12AM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 07:18:48AM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 11, 2013 at 7:32 AM, Catalin Marinas
> > <catalin.marinas@....com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 10:32:59PM +0100, Andrew Pinski wrote:
> > >> diff --git a/arch/arm64/Kconfig b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > >> index cc64df5..7fdc994 100644
> > >> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > >> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> > >> @@ -248,7 +248,7 @@ source "fs/Kconfig.binfmt"
> > >>
> > >> config COMPAT
> > >> def_bool y
> > >> - depends on ARM64_AARCH32
> > >> + depends on ARM64_AARCH32 || ARM64_ILP32
> > >> select COMPAT_BINFMT_ELF
> > >>
> > >> config ARM64_AARCH32
>
> (nitpick) We used to have an option like this, called
> CONFIG_AARCH32_EMULATION, which I think is clearer than CONFIG_ARM64_AARCH32.
I think avoiding "EMULATION" is better, we don't actually emulate the
instruction set ;).
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists