linux-kernel - [PATCH 004/228] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <7237b6f0cb157cf7989be74c4f1a10750df28b7c.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:29:10 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 004/228] cpufreq: Optimize cpufreq_frequency_table_verify()

cpufreq_frequency_table_verify() is a bit rewritten here to make it more logical
and optimal.
- merge multiple lines for variable declarations together.
- quit early if any frequency between min/max is found.
- don't call cpufreq_verify_within_limits() in case any valid freq is found as
  it is of no use.
- count renamed as found and made a boolean.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c | 25 +++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
index f111454a..53a2f1a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/freq_table.c
@@ -54,9 +54,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo);
 int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				   struct cpufreq_frequency_table *table)
 {
-	unsigned int next_larger = ~0;
-	unsigned int i;
-	unsigned int count = 0;
+	unsigned int next_larger = ~0, freq, i = 0;
+	bool found = false;
 
 	pr_debug("request for verification of policy (%u - %u kHz) for cpu %u\n",
 					policy->min, policy->max, policy->cpu);
@@ -64,21 +63,23 @@ int cpufreq_frequency_table_verify(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq,
 				     policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
 
-	for (i = 0; (table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END); i++) {
-		unsigned int freq = table[i].frequency;
+	for (; freq = table[i].frequency, freq != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++) {
 		if (freq == CPUFREQ_ENTRY_INVALID)
 			continue;
-		if ((freq >= policy->min) && (freq <= policy->max))
-			count++;
-		else if ((next_larger > freq) && (freq > policy->max))
+		if ((freq >= policy->min) && (freq <= policy->max)) {
+			found = true;
+			break;
+		}
+
+		if ((next_larger > freq) && (freq > policy->max))
 			next_larger = freq;
 	}
 
-	if (!count)
+	if (!found) {
 		policy->max = next_larger;
-
-	cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq,
-				     policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
+		cpufreq_verify_within_limits(policy, policy->cpuinfo.min_freq,
+				policy->cpuinfo.max_freq);
+	}
 
 	pr_debug("verification lead to (%u - %u kHz) for cpu %u\n",
 				policy->min, policy->max, policy->cpu);
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/