[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <573c49b075362c50298d94412f035e3c7125b24a.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:29:46 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: rjw@...k.pl
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 040/228] cpufreq: sc520: use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show()
Lets use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() instead of calling
cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() and cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr().
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c | 9 +--------
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
index d6f6c6f..bb9c0de 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sc520_freq.c
@@ -106,7 +106,6 @@ static int sc520_freq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
static int sc520_freq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
struct cpuinfo_x86 *c = &cpu_data(0);
- int result;
/* capability check */
if (c->x86_vendor != X86_VENDOR_AMD ||
@@ -117,13 +116,7 @@ static int sc520_freq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000000; /* 1ms */
policy->cur = sc520_freq_get_cpu_frequency(0);
- result = cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo(policy, sc520_freq_table);
- if (result)
- return result;
-
- cpufreq_frequency_table_get_attr(sc520_freq_table, policy->cpu);
-
- return 0;
+ return cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, sc520_freq_table);
}
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists