linux-kernel - [PATCH 100/228] cpufreq: e_powersaver: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <7d15f2a318238d6f93cee5ac92c037fda902898e.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:30:46 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 100/228] cpufreq: e_powersaver: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too

Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.

Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init().

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c | 1 -
 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
index a8cbbd0..2c11ce3 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/e_powersaver.c
@@ -395,7 +395,6 @@ static int eps_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	}
 
 	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 140000; /* 844mV -> 700mV in ns */
-	policy->cur = fsb * current_multiplier;
 
 	ret = cpufreq_table_validate_and_show(policy, &centaur->freq_table[0]);
 	if (ret) {
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/