linux-kernel - [PATCH 168/228] cpufreq: pmac32: Convert to light weight ->target

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:31:54 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 168/228] cpufreq: pmac32: Convert to light weight ->target_index() routine

This patch converts existing .target() to newly defined light weight
.target_index() routine for this driver.

CPUFreq core will call cpufreq_frequency_table_target() before calling this
routine and will pass index to it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 12 +++---------
 drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 17 ++++-------------
 2 files changed, 7 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
index 6eac1e2..9137fa9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
@@ -374,17 +374,11 @@ static unsigned int pmac_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
 }
 
 static int pmac_cpufreq_target(	struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-					unsigned int target_freq,
-					unsigned int relation)
+					unsigned int index)
 {
-	unsigned int    newstate = 0;
 	int		rc;
 
-	if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, pmac_cpu_freqs,
-			target_freq, relation, &newstate))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, newstate, 1);
+	rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, index, 1);
 
 	ppc_proc_freq = cur_freq * 1000ul;
 	return rc;
@@ -453,7 +447,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 
 static struct cpufreq_driver pmac_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.verify 	= cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
-	.target 	= pmac_cpufreq_target,
+	.target_index 	= pmac_cpufreq_target,
 	.get		= pmac_cpufreq_get_speed,
 	.init		= pmac_cpufreq_cpu_init,
 	.suspend	= pmac_cpufreq_suspend,
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
index b977b9a..af970b7 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
@@ -312,27 +312,18 @@ static int g5_pfunc_query_freq(void)
  * Common interface to the cpufreq core
  */
 
-static int g5_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
-	unsigned int target_freq, unsigned int relation)
+static int g5_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 {
-	unsigned int newstate = 0;
 	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 	int rc;
 
-	if (cpufreq_frequency_table_target(policy, g5_cpu_freqs,
-			target_freq, relation, &newstate))
-		return -EINVAL;
-
-	if (g5_pmode_cur == newstate)
-		return 0;
-
 	mutex_lock(&g5_switch_mutex);
 
 	freqs.old = g5_cpu_freqs[g5_pmode_cur].frequency;
-	freqs.new = g5_cpu_freqs[newstate].frequency;
+	freqs.new = g5_cpu_freqs[index].frequency;
 
 	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-	rc = g5_switch_freq(newstate);
+	rc = g5_switch_freq(index);
 	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
 
 	mutex_unlock(&g5_switch_mutex);
@@ -355,7 +346,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver g5_cpufreq_driver = {
 	.flags		= CPUFREQ_CONST_LOOPS,
 	.init		= g5_cpufreq_cpu_init,
 	.verify		= cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
-	.target		= g5_cpufreq_target,
+	.target_index	= g5_cpufreq_target,
 	.get		= g5_cpufreq_get_speed,
 	.attr 		= cpufreq_generic_attr,
 };
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/