linux-kernel - [PATCH 182/228] cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:08 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 182/228] cpufreq: acpi: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.

Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.

Reviewed-by: Lan Tianyu <tianyu.lan@...el.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c | 14 ++------------
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
index 7536e7d..6b00cd8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c
@@ -428,14 +428,10 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 {
 	struct acpi_cpufreq_data *data = per_cpu(acfreq_data, policy->cpu);
 	struct acpi_processor_performance *perf;
-	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 	struct drv_cmd cmd;
 	unsigned int next_perf_state = 0; /* Index into perf table */
 	int result = 0;
 
-	pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_target %d (%d)\n",
-			data->freq_table[index].frequency, policy->cpu);
-
 	if (unlikely(data == NULL ||
 	     data->acpi_data == NULL || data->freq_table == NULL)) {
 		return -ENODEV;
@@ -483,23 +479,17 @@ static int acpi_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 	else
 		cmd.mask = cpumask_of(policy->cpu);
 
-	freqs.old = perf->states[perf->state].core_frequency * 1000;
-	freqs.new = data->freq_table[index].frequency;
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
 	drv_write(&cmd);
 
 	if (acpi_pstate_strict) {
-		if (!check_freqs(cmd.mask, freqs.new, data)) {
+		if (!check_freqs(cmd.mask, data->freq_table[index].frequency,
+					data)) {
 			pr_debug("acpi_cpufreq_target failed (%d)\n",
 				policy->cpu);
 			result = -EAGAIN;
-			freqs.new = freqs.old;
 		}
 	}
 
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
 	if (!result)
 		perf->state = next_perf_state;
 
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/