lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:15 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 189/228] cpufreq: dbx500: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.

Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.

Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c | 22 +---------------------
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
index 238b169..0e67ab9 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/dbx500-cpufreq.c
@@ -22,28 +22,8 @@ static struct clk *armss_clk;
 static int dbx500_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 				unsigned int index)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-	int ret;
-
-	freqs.old = policy->cur;
-	freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
-
-	/* pre-change notification */
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
 	/* update armss clk frequency */
-	ret = clk_set_rate(armss_clk, freqs.new * 1000);
-
-	if (ret) {
-		pr_err("dbx500-cpufreq: Failed to set armss_clk to %d Hz: error %d\n",
-		       freqs.new * 1000, ret);
-		freqs.new = freqs.old;
-	}
-
-	/* post change notification */
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
-	return ret;
+	return clk_set_rate(armss_clk, freq_table[index].frequency * 1000);
 }
 
 static unsigned int dbx500_cpufreq_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists