linux-kernel - [PATCH 201/228] cpufreq: pmac: remove calls to cpufreq_notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:27 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Subject: [PATCH 201/228] cpufreq: pmac: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.

Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.

Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c | 20 ++++----------------
 drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c | 18 +-----------------
 2 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
index 9137fa9..476fc4a 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac32-cpufreq.c
@@ -331,21 +331,11 @@ static int pmu_set_cpu_speed(int low_speed)
 	return 0;
 }
 
-static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode,
-		int notify)
+static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 	unsigned long l3cr;
 	static unsigned long prev_l3cr;
 
-	freqs.old = cur_freq;
-	freqs.new = (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_HIGH) ? hi_freq : low_freq;
-
-	if (freqs.old == freqs.new)
-		return 0;
-
-	if (notify)
-		cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
 	if (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_LOW &&
 	    cpu_has_feature(CPU_FTR_L3CR)) {
 		l3cr = _get_L3CR();
@@ -361,8 +351,6 @@ static int do_set_cpu_speed(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, int speed_mode,
 		if ((prev_l3cr & L3CR_L3E) && l3cr != prev_l3cr)
 			_set_L3CR(prev_l3cr);
 	}
-	if (notify)
-		cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
 	cur_freq = (speed_mode == CPUFREQ_HIGH) ? hi_freq : low_freq;
 
 	return 0;
@@ -378,7 +366,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_target(	struct cpufreq_policy *policy,
 {
 	int		rc;
 
-	rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, index, 1);
+	rc = do_set_cpu_speed(policy, index);
 
 	ppc_proc_freq = cur_freq * 1000ul;
 	return rc;
@@ -420,7 +408,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_suspend(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	no_schedule = 1;
 	sleep_freq = cur_freq;
 	if (cur_freq == low_freq && !is_pmu_based)
-		do_set_cpu_speed(policy, CPUFREQ_HIGH, 0);
+		do_set_cpu_speed(policy, CPUFREQ_HIGH);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -437,7 +425,7 @@ static int pmac_cpufreq_resume(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
 	 * probably high speed due to our suspend() routine
 	 */
 	do_set_cpu_speed(policy, sleep_freq == low_freq ?
-			 CPUFREQ_LOW : CPUFREQ_HIGH, 0);
+			 CPUFREQ_LOW : CPUFREQ_HIGH);
 
 	ppc_proc_freq = cur_freq * 1000ul;
 
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
index af970b7..07ef0ee 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/pmac64-cpufreq.c
@@ -79,8 +79,6 @@ static void (*g5_switch_volt)(int speed_mode);
 static int (*g5_switch_freq)(int speed_mode);
 static int (*g5_query_freq)(void);
 
-static DEFINE_MUTEX(g5_switch_mutex);
-
 static unsigned long transition_latency;
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_PMAC_SMU
@@ -314,21 +312,7 @@ static int g5_pfunc_query_freq(void)
 
 static int g5_cpufreq_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
 {
-	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
-	int rc;
-
-	mutex_lock(&g5_switch_mutex);
-
-	freqs.old = g5_cpu_freqs[g5_pmode_cur].frequency;
-	freqs.new = g5_cpu_freqs[index].frequency;
-
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-	rc = g5_switch_freq(index);
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
-
-	mutex_unlock(&g5_switch_mutex);
-
-	return rc;
+	return g5_switch_freq(index);
 }
 
 static unsigned int g5_cpufreq_get_speed(unsigned int cpu)
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/