linux-kernel - [PATCH 206/228] cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <6e2ca86ce948c0bc35f7709baf22672771fcf1e8.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:32 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	rjw@...k.pl
Cc:	linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: [PATCH 206/228] cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to cpufreq_notify_transition()

Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:

	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
	freqs.old = old freq...
	freqs.new = new freq...

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);

	/* Change rate here */

	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);

This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.

Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.

Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.

Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
 drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c | 17 ++++++-----------
 drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c | 12 ++----------
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
index b0da1fe..623da74 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1100-cpufreq.c
@@ -180,22 +180,17 @@ static void sa1100_update_dram_timings(int current_speed, int new_speed)
 static int sa1100_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
 {
 	unsigned int cur = sa11x0_getspeed(0);
-	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
+	unsigned int new_freq;
 
-	freqs.old = cur;
-	freqs.new = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
+	new_freq = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
 
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
-	if (freqs.new > cur)
-		sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, freqs.new);
+	if (new_freq > cur)
+		sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, new_freq);
 
 	PPCR = ppcr;
 
-	if (freqs.new < cur)
-		sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, freqs.new);
-
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+	if (new_freq < cur)
+		sa1100_update_dram_timings(cur, new_freq);
 
 	return 0;
 }
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
index 55b1818c..2c2b2e6 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/sa1110-cpufreq.c
@@ -232,15 +232,11 @@ sdram_update_refresh(u_int cpu_khz, struct sdram_params *sdram)
 static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
 {
 	struct sdram_params *sdram = &sdram_params;
-	struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
 	struct sdram_info sd;
 	unsigned long flags;
 	unsigned int unused;
 
-	freqs.old = sa11x0_getspeed(0);
-	freqs.new = sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency;
-
-	sdram_calculate_timing(&sd, freqs.new, sdram);
+	sdram_calculate_timing(&sd, sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency, sdram);
 
 #if 0
 	/*
@@ -259,8 +255,6 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
 	sd.mdcas[2] = 0xaaaaaaaa;
 #endif
 
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
-
 	/*
 	 * The clock could be going away for some time.  Set the SDRAMs
 	 * to refresh rapidly (every 64 memory clock cycles).  To get
@@ -305,9 +299,7 @@ static int sa1110_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int ppcr)
 	/*
 	 * Now, return the SDRAM refresh back to normal.
 	 */
-	sdram_update_refresh(freqs.new, sdram);
-
-	cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
+	sdram_update_refresh(sa11x0_freq_table[ppcr].frequency, sdram);
 
 	return 0;
 }
-- 
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/