| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-Id: <95ec26b31c5b598f704bf8779802306607534721.1379063063.git.viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 18:32:45 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: rjw@...k.pl
Cc: linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Subject: [PATCH 219/228] cpufreq: exynos: use cpufreq_generic_get() routine
We have common infrastructure available with us for getting a CPUs clk rate.
Lets use it for this driver.
Cc: Amit Daniel Kachhap <amit.daniel@...sung.com>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c | 10 +++-------
drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c | 33 ++++++++++++++-------------------
2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
index c9ae7e6..0ef13e8 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos-cpufreq.c
@@ -30,11 +30,6 @@ static unsigned int locking_frequency;
static bool frequency_locked;
static DEFINE_MUTEX(cpufreq_lock);
-static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- return clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000;
-}
-
static int exynos_cpufreq_get_index(unsigned int freq)
{
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = exynos_info->freq_table;
@@ -214,6 +209,7 @@ static struct notifier_block exynos_cpufreq_nb = {
static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
+ policy->clk = exynos_info->cpu_clk;
return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, exynos_info->freq_table, 100000);
}
@@ -221,7 +217,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = exynos_target,
- .get = exynos_getspeed,
+ .get = cpufreq_generic_get,
.init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
.exit = cpufreq_generic_exit,
.name = "exynos_cpufreq",
@@ -263,7 +259,7 @@ static int __init exynos_cpufreq_init(void)
goto err_vdd_arm;
}
- locking_frequency = exynos_getspeed(0);
+ locking_frequency = clk_get_rate(exynos_info->cpu_clk) / 1000;
register_pm_notifier(&exynos_cpufreq_nb);
diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
index 340b53e..4b2703d 100644
--- a/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
+++ b/drivers/cpufreq/exynos5440-cpufreq.c
@@ -100,7 +100,6 @@ struct exynos_dvfs_data {
struct resource *mem;
int irq;
struct clk *cpu_clk;
- unsigned int cur_frequency;
unsigned int latency;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table;
unsigned int freq_count;
@@ -165,7 +164,7 @@ static int init_div_table(void)
return 0;
}
-static void exynos_enable_dvfs(void)
+static void exynos_enable_dvfs(unsigned int cur_frequency)
{
unsigned int tmp, i, cpu;
struct cpufreq_frequency_table *freq_table = dvfs_info->freq_table;
@@ -184,18 +183,18 @@ static void exynos_enable_dvfs(void)
/* Set initial performance index */
for (i = 0; freq_table[i].frequency != CPUFREQ_TABLE_END; i++)
- if (freq_table[i].frequency == dvfs_info->cur_frequency)
+ if (freq_table[i].frequency == cur_frequency)
break;
if (freq_table[i].frequency == CPUFREQ_TABLE_END) {
dev_crit(dvfs_info->dev, "Boot up frequency not supported\n");
/* Assign the highest frequency */
i = 0;
- dvfs_info->cur_frequency = freq_table[i].frequency;
+ cur_frequency = freq_table[i].frequency;
}
dev_info(dvfs_info->dev, "Setting dvfs initial frequency = %uKHZ",
- dvfs_info->cur_frequency);
+ cur_frequency);
for (cpu = 0; cpu < CONFIG_NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
tmp = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_C0_3_PSTATE + cpu * 4);
@@ -209,11 +208,6 @@ static void exynos_enable_dvfs(void)
dvfs_info->base + XMU_DVFS_CTRL);
}
-static unsigned int exynos_getspeed(unsigned int cpu)
-{
- return dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
-}
-
static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
{
unsigned int tmp;
@@ -222,7 +216,7 @@ static int exynos_target(struct cpufreq_policy *policy, unsigned int index)
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
- freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
@@ -253,7 +247,7 @@ static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work)
goto skip_work;
mutex_lock(&cpufreq_lock);
- freqs.old = dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
+ freqs.old = policy->cur;
cur_pstate = __raw_readl(dvfs_info->base + XMU_P_STATUS);
if (cur_pstate >> C0_3_PSTATE_VALID_SHIFT & 0x1)
@@ -263,10 +257,9 @@ static void exynos_cpufreq_work(struct work_struct *work)
if (likely(index < dvfs_info->freq_count)) {
freqs.new = freq_table[index].frequency;
- dvfs_info->cur_frequency = freqs.new;
} else {
dev_crit(dvfs_info->dev, "New frequency out of range\n");
- freqs.new = dvfs_info->cur_frequency;
+ freqs.new = freqs.old;
}
cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
@@ -310,6 +303,7 @@ static void exynos_sort_descend_freq_table(void)
static int exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
{
+ policy->clk = dvfs_info->cpu_clk;
return cpufreq_generic_init(policy, dvfs_info->freq_table,
dvfs_info->latency);
}
@@ -318,7 +312,7 @@ static struct cpufreq_driver exynos_driver = {
.flags = CPUFREQ_STICKY | CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION,
.verify = cpufreq_generic_frequency_table_verify,
.target_index = exynos_target,
- .get = exynos_getspeed,
+ .get = cpufreq_generic_get,
.init = exynos_cpufreq_cpu_init,
.exit = cpufreq_generic_exit,
.name = CPUFREQ_NAME,
@@ -337,6 +331,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
int ret = -EINVAL;
struct device_node *np;
struct resource res;
+ unsigned int cur_frequency;
np = pdev->dev.of_node;
if (!np)
@@ -392,13 +387,13 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_free_table;
}
- dvfs_info->cur_frequency = clk_get_rate(dvfs_info->cpu_clk);
- if (!dvfs_info->cur_frequency) {
+ cur_frequency = clk_get_rate(dvfs_info->cpu_clk);
+ if (!cur_frequency) {
dev_err(dvfs_info->dev, "Failed to get clock rate\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto err_free_table;
}
- dvfs_info->cur_frequency /= 1000;
+ cur_frequency /= 1000;
INIT_WORK(&dvfs_info->irq_work, exynos_cpufreq_work);
ret = devm_request_irq(dvfs_info->dev, dvfs_info->irq,
@@ -415,7 +410,7 @@ static int exynos_cpufreq_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
goto err_free_table;
}
- exynos_enable_dvfs();
+ exynos_enable_dvfs(cur_frequency);
ret = cpufreq_register_driver(&exynos_driver);
if (ret) {
dev_err(dvfs_info->dev,
--
1.7.12.rc2.18.g61b472e
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists