linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/9] mm: introduce api for split page table lock for PMD level

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 15:19:07 +0200
From:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:	"Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	Alex Thorlton <athorlton@....com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>,
	"Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Robin Holt <robinmholt@...il.com>,
	Sedat Dilek <sedat.dilek@...il.com>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] mm: introduce api for split page table lock for PMD
 level

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 04:06:10PM +0300, Kirill A. Shutemov wrote:
> Basic api, backed by mm->page_table_lock for now. Actual implementation
> will be added later.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Naoya Horiguchi <n-horiguchi@...jp.nec.com>
> Signed-off-by: Kirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
>  include/linux/mm.h | 13 +++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 13 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm.h b/include/linux/mm.h
> index 6cf8ddb..d4361e7 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm.h
> @@ -1294,6 +1294,19 @@ static inline void pgtable_page_dtor(struct page *page)
>  	((unlikely(pmd_none(*(pmd))) && __pte_alloc_kernel(pmd, address))? \
>  		NULL: pte_offset_kernel(pmd, address))
>  
> +static inline spinlock_t *huge_pmd_lockptr(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> +	return &mm->page_table_lock;
> +}
> +
> +
> +static inline spinlock_t *huge_pmd_lock(struct mm_struct *mm, pmd_t *pmd)
> +{
> +	spinlock_t *ptl = huge_pmd_lockptr(mm, pmd);
> +	spin_lock(ptl);
> +	return ptl;
> +}

Why not call the thing pmd_lock()? The pmd bit differentiates it from
pte_lock() enough IMIO.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/