linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] i2c: prepare runtime PM support for I2C client devices

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87bo3whjz4.fsf@linaro.org>
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 07:30:55 -0700
From:	Kevin Hilman <khilman@...aro.org>
To:	Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>
Cc:	linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org, Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>,
	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
	linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Aaron Lu <aaron.lu@...el.com>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
	Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <m.chehab@...sung.com>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/9] i2c: prepare runtime PM support for I2C client devices

Mika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com> writes:

> On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 02:34:21PM -0700, Kevin Hilman wrote:
>> > diff --git a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
>> > index f32ca29..44374b4 100644
>> > --- a/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
>> > +++ b/drivers/i2c/i2c-core.c
>> > @@ -248,11 +248,30 @@ static int i2c_device_probe(struct device *dev)
>> >  					client->flags & I2C_CLIENT_WAKE);
>> >  	dev_dbg(dev, "probe\n");
>> >  
>> > +	/* Make sure the adapter is active */
>> > +	pm_runtime_get_sync(&client->adapter->dev);
>> > +
>> > +	/*
>> > +	 * Enable runtime PM for the client device. If the client wants to
>> > +	 * participate on runtime PM it should call pm_runtime_put() in its
>> > +	 * probe() callback.
>> > +	 */
>> > +	pm_runtime_get_noresume(&client->dev);
>> > +	pm_runtime_set_active(&client->dev);
>> 
>> Why the set_active here?
>> 
>> For hardware that is disabled/powered-off on startup, there will now be
>> a mismatch between the hardware state an the RPM core state.
>
> The call to pm_runtime_get_noresume() should make sure that the device is
> in active state (at least in state where it can access the bus) if I'm
> understanding this right.

No, after _get_noresume(), nothing happens to the hardware.  It simply
increments the usecount.  From pm_runtime.h:

static inline void pm_runtime_get_noresume(struct device *dev)
{
	atomic_inc(&dev->power.usage_count);
}

So after the _get_noresume() and _set_active() you're very likely to
have a disconnect between the hardware state and what state RPM thinks
the hardware is in.

Kevin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/