[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1309131628250.4089@ionos.tec.linutronix.de>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:32:24 +0200 (CEST)
From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
To: Fan Du <fan.du@...driver.com>
cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>, herbert@...dor.hengli.com.au,
steffen.klassert@...unet.com, dborkman@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv3 linux-next] hrtimer: Add notifier when clock_was_set
was called
On Fri, 13 Sep 2013, Fan Du wrote:
> (2) What I have been bugging you around here for this long time is really the
> second
> problem, I'm sorry I didn't make it clearly to you and others, which is
> below:
>
> Why using wall clock time to calculate soft/hard IPsec events when
> xfrm_state timer
> out happens in its timeout handler? Because even if xfrm_state using
> CLOCK_BOOTTIME,
> system wall clock time changing will surely disturb soft/hard IPsec
> events, which
> you raised your concern about in (*a*).
No CLOCK_BOOTTIME is not affected by wall clock time changes. It's
basically CLOCK_MONOTONIC, it just keeps counting the suspend time as
well. So without a suspend/resume cycle CLOCK_MONOTONIC and
CLOCK_BOOTTIME are the same. After a suspend/resume cycle
CLOCK_BOOTTIME will be N seconds ahead of CLOCK_MONOTONIC, where N is
the number of seconds spent in suspend.
Thanks,
tglx
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists