[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130913155424.GB12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 16:54:24 +0100
From: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc: rjw@...k.pl, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 206/228] cpufreq: sa11x0: remove calls to
cpufreq_notify_transition()
On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:32:32PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Most of the drivers do following in their ->target_index() routines:
>
> struct cpufreq_freqs freqs;
> freqs.old = old freq...
> freqs.new = new freq...
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_PRECHANGE);
>
> /* Change rate here */
>
> cpufreq_notify_transition(policy, &freqs, CPUFREQ_POSTCHANGE);
>
> This is replicated over all cpufreq drivers today and there doesn't exists a
> good enough reason why this shouldn't be moved to cpufreq core instead.
>
> Earlier patches have added support in cpufreq core to do cpufreq notification on
> frequency change, this one removes it from this driver.
>
> Some related minor cleanups are also done along with it.
>
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Shouldn't this patch set CPUFREQ_ASYNC_NOTIFICATION somewhere?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists