linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 106/228] cpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of policy that is set by core too

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130913161059.GD12758@n2100.arm.linux.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 13 Sep 2013 17:10:59 +0100
From:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
To:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	rjw@...k.pl, linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org, patches@...aro.org,
	cpufreq@...r.kernel.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 106/228] cpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of
	policy that is set by core too

On Fri, Sep 13, 2013 at 06:30:52PM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
> this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
> 
> Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
> ->init().
> 
> Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
> Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
> ---
>  drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c | 5 ++---
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c
> index 8152a9b..babf3e4 100644
> --- a/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c
> +++ b/drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c
> @@ -181,10 +181,9 @@ static int integrator_cpufreq_init(struct cpufreq_policy *policy)
>  {
>  
>  	/* set default policy and cpuinfo */
> -	policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 160000;
> -	policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 12000;
> +	policy->max = policy->cpuinfo.max_freq = 160000;
> +	policy->min = policy->cpuinfo.min_freq = 12000;
>  	policy->cpuinfo.transition_latency = 1000000; /* 1 ms, assumed */
> -	policy->cur = policy->min = policy->max = integrator_get(policy->cpu);

This patch actually changes things - the description is misleading.
Please explain why this change - which results in different values for
policy->min and policy->max doesn't cause any functional difference.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/