[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponAWXXCVtDL1=C5sQv0QB03P4jtkyE7N+=DDdGPLZpW_w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Sep 2013 21:59:10 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Lists linaro-kernel <linaro-kernel@...ts.linaro.org>,
Patch Tracking <patches@...aro.org>,
"cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 106/228] cpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of
policy that is set by core too
On 13 September 2013 21:40, Russell King - ARM Linux
<linux@....linux.org.uk> wrote:
> This patch actually changes things - the description is misleading.
> Please explain why this change - which results in different values for
> policy->min and policy->max doesn't cause any functional difference.
Yeah, see if below log looks correct (patch attached):
Subject: [PATCH 106/228] cpufreq: integrator: don't initialize part of policy
that is set by core too
Many common initializations of struct policy are moved to core now and hence
this driver doesn't need to do it. This patch removes such code.
Most recent of those changes is to call ->get() in the core after calling
->init(). And so we don't need to set policy->cur from driver anymore.
Over that it sets policy->min and max correctly. They were earlier set to
current frequency of CPU but they should be set to max and min freq of cpu.
Cc: Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
---
drivers/cpufreq/integrator-cpufreq.c | 5 ++---
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
Download attachment "0106-cpufreq-integrator-don-t-initialize-part-of-policy-t.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (1805 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists